Default Prevention Pricing Models – Which is Best for You?

Posted on Jan. 30, 2019 | By The Attigo Team

Default prevention service providers are tasked with reducing student loan delinquency and default. To make a positive impact, they use a customized combination of outreach methods, counseling practices and skip trace strategies. While these standard activities are part of each provider’s service there are certainly differences that make one vendor’s program a better match for your needs than another. The same thing can be said about pricing and fees.

blog-post-hubspot-default-prevention-pricing-models

Just like there are multiple ways to engage and counsel borrowers, there are multiple pricing models for default prevention services. At first glance, pricing approach may not seem like a big deal, but there are some striking differences when you look at the details. So, just as you evaluate outreach and counseling services you’ll want to appraise pricing - run a few scenarios and make a pros & cons list. What, you don’t have time for that kind of research?

With that in mind we thought it would be helpful to share what we know in this little version of a “Buyers Guide”.

The most common pricing models for default prevention services are:

default-prevention-pricing-models

Evaluating Each Model

When determining which pricing model makes the most sense for your school, it’s important to keep your goal in mind.

Potential Goals:

  • Lower our CDR, it’s too high
  • Help stop outs avoid default, so they can re-enroll
  • Support students with higher indebtedness, so they’re less stressed as they start careers

Is your school laser focused on lowering your CDR or do you want to help recent graduates manage significant indebtedness? It’s also important to know your borrower population, including your average delinquency rate (e.g., the estimated number of borrowers that will reach 60 or 90 days past due).

Pricing models use different factors to calculate fees. Some are focused on the number of borrowers who are currently delinquent and receiving outreach, while others count new cures and still others use historical data like the number of borrowers who have previously defaulted. So an apple to apple comparison can be a bit challenging. To help, we’ve defined a scenario, shared our assumptions and provided the math so you can see how these models stack up.

The Scenario

1,000  Borrowers in repayment

400    Borrowers at least 60 days delinquent getting outreach until they cure or default

Of the 400:

  • 250 Borrowers Cure (BC)
  • 150  Borrowers Default (BD)

The Math

Pricing table model presenting fee examples and cost of service in relation to cures example

Now let’s look at it from another perspective - how much would you pay when a borrower defaults? After 10 months of outreach (from day 60-360) 150 borrowers in our scenario failed to cure.

Pricing table model presenting the cost of service in relation to 150 defaults after 10 months of outreach

And finally, let’s look at the total cost for services delivered to all 400 delinquent borrowers. Let’s add the cost of the cures to the cost of the defaults. And let’s assume for the fee per borrower per month, that the cures, on average, took 4 months.

Pricing model table presenting total cost of services for 400 borrowers

Pros & Cons

So math is one way to look at the different pricing approaches, but a simple pros and cons list can also help round out the comparison.

Pros and Cons table

Download this great information in a portable PDF.

Don’t Underestimate the Cost of Poor Service

Price is definitely an important factor in default prevention services. But there is a cost to poor service that goes beyond fees.  

To wrap up this post we close with a little insight on quality counseling. Making comparisons between potential service providers can be done by asking a few poignant questions related to their counseling approach and staff expertise.

  • What is the average length of service for counselors? This tell-tale number is an important factor in assessing the quality of service. If average time-in-position is less than two years, your students may be talking to staff that:
    • Rely on scripts to navigate conversations
    • Aren’t thoroughly versed in all the nuances of student loans and can make mistakes
    • Lack the confidence to converse about options beyond forbearance and deferment
  • How much training and coaching do counselors receive? A thorough plan should include ongoing call reviews, supervisor coaching, and training related to the constantly evolving student loan industry.
  • What is their counseling approach? If the team uses call scripts and focus on warm transfers to servicers, the emphasis can be on turning over the fastest solution. Whereas, call modeling to gently steer conversations and three-way loan service conversations (were counselors advocate for borrowers) can result in better outcomes and long-term repayment success.

Questions?

Don’t hesitate to reach out!

Subscribe to Blog

Recent Blog Posts

View All Posts

Leave a Comment